4.2 Article

Root endophytic Penicillium promotes growth of Antarctic vascular plants by enhancing nitrogen mineralization

Journal

EXTREMOPHILES
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages 721-732

Publisher

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s00792-020-01189-7

Keywords

Endophytes; Antarctic vascular plants; Penicillium; Growth; Nitrogen; Mineralization

Funding

  1. National Fund for Scientific and Technological Development, FONDECYT [3140279]
  2. Chilean Antarctic Institute (INACH) [INACH G22-11]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fungal endophyte associations have been suggested as a possible strategy of Antarctic vascular plants for surviving the extreme environmental conditions of Antarctica. However, the mechanisms by which this occurs are still poorly understood. The role of root fungal endophytes in nitrogen mineralization and nutrient uptake, as well as their impact on the performance of Antarctic plants, were studied. We tested root endophytes, isolated fromColobanthus quitensisandDeschampsia antarctica, for lignocellulolytic enzyme production, nitrogen mineralization, and growth enhancement of their host plants.Penicillium chrysogenumandPenicillium brevicompactumwere identified using a molecular approach as the main root endophytes inhabitingC. quitensisandD. antarctica, respectively. Both root endophytes were characterized as psychrophilic fungi displaying amylase, esterase, protease, cellulase, hemicellulase, phosphatase and urease enzymatic activities, mainly at 4 degrees C. Moreover, the rates and percentages of nitrogen mineralization, as well as the final total biomass, were significantly higher in symbioticC. quitensisandD. antarcticaindividuals. Our findings suggest that root endophytes exert a pivotal ecological role based not only to breakdown different nutrient sources but also on accelerating nitrogen mineralization, improving nutrient acquisition, and therefore promoting plant growth in Antarctic terrestrial ecosystems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available