4.6 Article

Influence of growth hormone therapy on the occurrence of a second neoplasm in survivors of childhood cancer

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 183, Issue 4, Pages 471-480

Publisher

BIOSCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1530/EJE-20-0369

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. EDF
  2. Fondation ARC (Program PopHARC)
  3. Societe Francaise des Cancers de l'Enfant
  4. Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer (LNCC)
  5. Institut de Recherche en Sante Publique (IRESP)
  6. Agence Nationale pour la Recherche (Projet Hope-Epi)
  7. Fondation Pfizer for the childhood and adolescent health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context: Growth hormone (GH) deficiency is a common late effect of cranial irradiation. However, concerns have been raised that GH treatment might lead to an increased risk of a second neoplasm (SN). Objective: To study the impact of GH treatment on the risk of SN in a French cohort of survivors of childhood cancer (CCS) treated before 1986. Design and setting: Cohort study and nested case-control study. Participants: Of the 2852 survivors, with a median follow-up of 26 years, 196 had received GH therapy (median delay from cancer diagnosis: 5.5 years). Main outcome measures: Occurrence of SN Results: In total, 374 survivors developed a SN, including 40 who had received GH therapy. In a multivariate analysis, GH treatment did not increase the risk of secondary non-meningioma brain tumors (RR: 0.6, 95% CI: 0.2-1.5, P = 0.3), secondary non-brain cancer (RR: 0.7, 95% CI: 0.4-1.2, P = 0.2), or meningioma (RR: 1.9, 95% CI: 0.9-4, P = 0.09). Nevertheless, we observed a slight non-significant increase in the risk of meningioma with GH duration: 1.6-fold (95% CI: 1.2-3.0) after an exposure of less than 4 years vs 2.3-fold (95% CI: 0.9-5.6) after a longer exposure (P for trend = 0.07) confirmed by the results of a case-control study. Conclusion: This study confirms the overall safety of GH use in survivors of childhood cancer, which does not increase the risk of a SN. The slight excess in the risk of meningioma in patients with long-term GH treatment is non-significant and could be due to difficulties in adjustment on cranial radiation volume/dose and/or undiagnosed meningioma predisposing conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available