4.8 Article

Light Absorbing Properties of Primary and Secondary Brown Carbon in a Tropical Urban Environment

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 54, Issue 17, Pages 10808-10819

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c02414

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Environmental Agency (NEA) of Singapore (NEA) [1R-706-000-043-490]
  2. National University of Singapore [R-302-000-173-133]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Brown carbon (BrC) has significant climatic impact, but its emission sources and formation processes remain under-represented in climate models. However, there are only limited field studies to quantify the light absorption properties of specific types of primary and secondary organic aerosols (POAs and SOAs) in different environments. This work investigates the light absorption properties of the major OA components in Singapore, a well-developed city in the tropical region, where air quality can be influenced by multiple local urban sources and regional biomass burning events. The source-specific mass absorption cross-section (MAC) and wavelength dependence of different BrC components were quantified based on highly time-resolved aerosol chemical composition and absorption measurements. In particular, the combustion-related emission sources were the primary contributors to BrC light absorption and they were moderately absorbing. The SOA materials, which were freshly formed under atmospheric conditions with industrial influences, were also moderately light absorptive. The aged SOA components that were composed of aged regional emissions, including biomass burning and coal combustion emissions from nearby regions, were weakly light absorbing, highlighting the possibility of photobleaching of BrC during their atmospheric aging and dispersion. Lastly, our estimations illustrate that typical urban POAs and SOAs can contribute up to approximately 36-58% of the BrC absorption, even in some urban locations that are influenced by biomass burning emissions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available