4.8 Article

Oxygenated Aromatic Compounds are Important Precursors of Secondary Organic Aerosol in Biomass-Burning Emissions

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 54, Issue 14, Pages 8568-8579

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c01345

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [NA17OAR4310003, NA17OAR4310001, NA16OAR4310112, NA16OAR4310111]
  2. National Science Foundation [AGS-1559607]
  3. Colorado Energy Research Collaboratory [37-2018]
  4. Environmental Protection Agency [RD839278]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biomass burning is the largest combustion-related source of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) to the atmosphere. We describe the development of a state-of-the-science model to simulate the photochemical formation of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) from biomass-burning emissions observed in dry (RH <20%) environmental chamber experiments. The modeling is supported by (i) new oxidation chamber measurements, (ii) detailed concurrent measurements of SOA precursors in biomass-burning emissions, and (iii) development of SOA parameters for heterocyclic and oxygenated aromatic compounds based on historical chamber experiments. We find that oxygenated aromatic compounds, including phenols and methoxyphenols, account for slightly less than 60% of the SOA formed and help our model explain the variability in the organic aerosol mass (R-2= 0.68) and O/C (R-2 = 0.69) enhancement ratios observed across 11 chamber experiments. Despite abundant emissions, heterocyclic compounds that included furans contribute to similar to 20% of the total SOA. The use of pyrolysis-temperature-based or averaged emission profiles to represent SOA precursors, rather than those specific to each fire, provide similar results to within 20%. Our findings demonstrate the necessity of accounting for oxygenated aromatics from biomass-burning emissions and their SOA formation in chemical mechanisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available