4.7 Article

Do recent NDVI trends demonstrate boreal forest decline in Alaska?

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab9c4c

Keywords

succession; forest fire; fire recovery; remote sensing; NASA ABoVE

Funding

  1. NASA ABoVE [NNX15AU16A]
  2. UCI's Undergraduate Research Opportunity Program
  3. Ridge to Reef NSF Research Traineeship [DGE-1735040]
  4. NASA [797371, NNX15AU16A] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Remote sensing analyses of boreal forest regions have found widespread decreasing or increasing trends in normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI). Initially, these trends were attributed to climate change induced shifts in primary productivity. It is emerging, however, that fire disturbance and subsequent succession also strongly impact the optical properties of boreal forests. Here we use NDVI time series data from Landsat (1999-2018) paired with surveys of 102 forest stands with known recent fire history to investigate the relationship between NDVI and forest structure during succession. We found that NDVI varies systematically with stand age as a result of successional changes in forest structure and composition and that the proportion of deciduous (broad-leaved) trees in the upper canopy is a better predictor of NDVI than leaf area index. Recent fire disturbance led to strong NDVI decreases and early post-fire recovery of herbaceous and deciduous vegetation to strong NDVI increases. The mid-succession transition from deciduous to evergreen (needle-leaved) stands led to weak NDVI decreases, while mid-to-late succession thinning of evergreen canopies led to weak NDVI increases. Thus, both increasing and decreasing NDVI stands occur naturally across the landscape, and do not necessarily reflect a large-scale shift in boreal forest productivity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available