Vulnerability assessment of cities to earthquake based on the catastrophe theory: a case study of Tabriz city, Iran
Published 2020 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Vulnerability assessment of cities to earthquake based on the catastrophe theory: a case study of Tabriz city, Iran
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Environmental Earth Sciences
Volume 79, Issue 14, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Online
2020-07-07
DOI
10.1007/s12665-020-09103-2
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Evaluating seismic risk in small and medium-sized cities with the modified vulnerability index method, a case study in Jiangyou City, China
- (2019) Hao Zheng et al. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
- Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Model for Seismic Vulnerability Assessment (SVA) of Urban Residential Buildings
- (2018) Mohsen Alizadeh et al. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
- A GIS-based multi-criteria analysis model for earthquake vulnerability assessment using Choquet integral and game theory
- (2017) Milad Moradi et al. NATURAL HAZARDS
- Vulnerability to Earthquake Hazard: Bucharest Case Study, Romania
- (2017) Iuliana Armaş et al. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science
- Mapping groundwater potential field using catastrophe fuzzy membership functions and Jenks optimization method: a case study of Maragheh-Bonab plain, Iran
- (2016) Sina Sadeghfam et al. Environmental Earth Sciences
- A comparison between index of entropy and catastrophe theory methods for mapping groundwater potential in an arid region
- (2015) Alaa M. Al-Abadi et al. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT
- A multi-criteria evaluation model of earthquake vulnerability in Victoria, British Columbia
- (2014) Blake Byron Walker et al. NATURAL HAZARDS
- Assessment of groundwater potential zones in an arid region based on catastrophe theory
- (2014) Kamal Ahmed et al. Earth Science Informatics
- Using Spatial Multi-Criteria Analysis and Ranking Tool (SMART) in earthquake risk assessment: a case study of Delhi region, India
- (2014) Nishant Sinha et al. Geomatics Natural Hazards & Risk
- A cusp catastrophe model of mid–long-term landslide evolution over low latitude highlands of China
- (2013) Yun Tao et al. GEOMORPHOLOGY
- Assessing building vulnerability to earthquake and tsunami hazard using remotely sensed data
- (2012) M. Mück et al. NATURAL HAZARDS
- Multi-criteria vulnerability analysis to earthquake hazard of Bucharest, Romania
- (2012) Iuliana Armaş NATURAL HAZARDS
- Assessment of urban water security based on catastrophe theory
- (2012) Fengshun Yang et al. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Catastrophe theory to assess water security and adaptation strategy in the context of environmental change
- (2012) Wang Xiao-jun et al. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
- An integrated earthquake vulnerability assessment framework for urban areas
- (2011) H. S. B. Duzgun et al. NATURAL HAZARDS
- Assessing land ecological security in Shanghai (China) based on catastrophe theory
- (2011) Shiliang Su et al. STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT
- Microseismicity and seismotectonics of the North Tabriz fault (Iran)
- (2011) Ali Siahkali Moradi et al. TECTONOPHYSICS
- Seismic vulnerability and risk assessment: case study of the historic city centre of Coimbra, Portugal
- (2010) Romeu Vicente et al. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
- Assessment of a model of pollution disaster in near-shore coastal waters based on catastrophe theory
- (2010) Wenjun Wang et al. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING
- Seismic vulnerability and risk evaluation methods for urban areas. A review with application to a pilot area
- (2009) Alex H. Barbat et al. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started