4.7 Article

Suppression of interdendritic segregation during welding of a 347 austenitic stainless steel pipe reactors

Journal

ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS
Volume 114, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104589

Keywords

347 stainless steel; Welding; Metallographic; Dendrites; Solidification modeling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A study was conducted on in - situ gas tungsten arc welded 347 austenitic stainless steel pipes used in a catalytic reactor of a petrochemical plant which eventually failed. Removed parts were studied by using scanning and transmission electron microscopy techniques (SEM, TEM). A complete phase identification was achieved with X - ray diffraction analysis. Microstructural characterization on longitudinally welded paths revealed that cracks started from porosity regions located in welded ribbons and they continue their propagation through the heat affected zone (HAZ) and the base material. The failed welded ribbons microstructure is conformed by gamma columnar dendrites with interdendritic segregation and intermetallic compounds both associated with porosity, altogether inducing a prone failure. To overcome this problem, a constrained solidification dendrite growth model was incorporated in conjunction with the in situ welding of ribbons on 347 SS pipes. Gas tungsten arc welding (GTAW) pipe microstructures were obtained by using the predicted growth velocities (between constitutional supercooling (Vc) and absolute stability (Va) regimes) required to achieve the desire welded ribbons microstructural features. Thus, theoretical predictions exposed the optimal conditions in terms of growth velocities to suppress detrimental features such as interdendritic segregation and crack initiation, aiming welded paths exhibiting segregation - free columnar dendrites and lack of porosity at solidification growth velocities of >= 2.2 x 10(-2) cm/s.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available