4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Designing the Heat Merit Order to determine the value of industrial waste heat for district heating systems

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 200, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117579

Keywords

District heating; Heat merit order; Industry; Marginal costs; Third party feed-in; Waste heat

Funding

  1. Austrian Ministry for Transport, Innovation and Technology [845161]
  2. Austrian Climate and Energy Funds [853169]
  3. state of Upper Austria

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using industrial waste heat increases primary energy efficiency and may reduce costs. District heating networks are a promising sink as temperatures are relatively low. Usually only the end-use prices are public; but these include network infrastructure costs, maintenance costs etc. The value of a certain kWh fed in, i.e. the current marginal costs for the generation of heat, are not transparent. However, current marginal generation costs are decisive for the use of waste heat as the accumulated producer surplus determines the profitability of investment. To make marginal generation costs transparent, a Heat Merit Order is constructed. Based on conversion factors, fuel prices, network tariffs, etc. the maximum remuneration payed by the district heating operator at a certain point of time is made calculable. For a case study, the applicability to estimate maximum investment costs is proven. In conclusion, the Heat Merit Order makes local heat generation prices transparent and allows to calculate the profitability of integrating waste heat, other heat sources and storages; it enables companies to estimate the value of waste heat and if investments are profitable. Finally, the Heat Merit Order avoids information asymmetries and thus generally supports the efficiency and penetration of district heating. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available