4.5 Article

Ciprofloxacin, diclofenac, ibuprofen and 17α-ethinylestradiol differentially affect the activity of acetogens and methanogens in anaerobic communities

Journal

ECOTOXICOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 7, Pages 866-875

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10646-020-02256-7

Keywords

Activated sludge; Anaerobic digestion; Methanogenic activity; Pharmaceuticals; Toxicity; Wastewater

Funding

  1. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) [UID/BIO/04469/2019]
  2. European Regional Development Fund [NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000004]
  3. FCT [SFRH/BD/131905/2017]
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/131905/2017] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pharmaceutical compounds end up in wastewater treatment plants but little is known on their effect towards the different microbial groups in anaerobic communities. In this work, the effect of the antibiotic Ciprofloxacin (CIP), the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs Diclofenac (DCF) and Ibuprofen (IBP), and the hormone 17 alpha-ethinylestradiol (EE2), on the activity of acetogens and methanogens in anaerobic communities, was investigated. Microbial communities were more affected by CIP, followed by EE2, DCF and IBP, but the response of the different microbial groups was dissimilar. For concentrations of 0.01 to 0.1 mg/L, the specific methanogenic activity was not affected. Acetogenic bacteria were sensitive to CIP concentrations above 1 mg/L, while DCF and EE2 toxicity was only detected for concentrations higher than 10 mg/L, and IBP had no effect in all concentrations tested. Acetoclastic methanogens showed higher sensitivity to the presence of these micropollutants, being affect by all the tested pharmaceutical compounds although at different degrees. Hydrogenotrophic methanogens were not affected by any concentration, indicating their lower sensitivity to these compounds when compared to acetoclasts and acetogens.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available