4.4 Article

Smoking andCOVID-19: Similar bronchialACE2andTMPRSS2expression and higherTMPRSS4expression in current versus never smokers

Journal

DRUG DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH
Volume 81, Issue 8, Pages 1073-1080

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ddr.21729

Keywords

ACE2; nicotine; nitric oxide; TMPRSS2; TMPRSS4

Funding

  1. Yoran Institute for Human Genome Research at Tel Aviv University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Uncertainties remain concerning the pathophysiology, epidemiology, and potential therapeutics for COVID-19. Among unsettled controversies is whether tobacco smoking increases or protects from severe COVID-19. Several epidemiological studies reported reduced COVID-19 hospitalizations among smokers, while other studies reported the opposite trend. Some authors assumed that smokers have elevated airway expression of ACE2, the cell recognition site of the SARS-Cov-2 spike protein, but this suggestion remains unverified. We therefore performed data mining of two independent NCBI GEO genome-wide RNA expression files (GSE7894 and GSE994) and report that in both data sets, current smokers and never smokers have, on average, closely similar bronchial epithelial cell mRNA levels ofACE2, as well asTMPRSS2, coding for a serine protease priming SARS-Cov-2 for cell entry, andADAM17, coding for a protease implicated in ACE2 membrane shedding. In contrast, the expression levels ofTMPRSS4, coding for a protease that primes SARS-CoV-2 for cell entry similarly toTMPRSS2, were elevated in bronchial epithelial cells from current smokers compared with never smokers, suggesting that higher bronchialTMPRSS4levels in smokers might put them at higher SARS-Cov-2 infection risk. The effects of smoking on COVID-19 severity need clarification with larger studies. Additionally, the postulated protective effects of nicotine and nitric oxide, which may presumably reduce the risk of a cytokine storm in infected individuals, deserve assessment by controlled clinical trials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available