4.3 Article

DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection for the Treatment of Glabellar Lines: Efficacy Results From SAKURA 3, a Large, Open-Label, Phase 3 Safety Study

Journal

DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY
Volume 47, Issue 1, Pages 48-54

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000002531

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Revance Therapeutics, Inc., Newark, CA
  2. Revance Therapeutics, Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrates that DAXI shows highly consistent efficacy in repeat treatments, with a favorable safety profile and long duration of response.
BACKGROUND DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection (DAXI) is botulinum toxin Type A formulated with a novel peptide excipient. Two pivotal, single-treatment, placebo-controlled trials demonstrated efficacy and safety for moderate or severe glabellar lines. OBJECTIVE To further evaluate DAXI in a large, open-label, repeat-treatment study. METHODS Subjects (n = 2,691) were enrolled from the preceding pivotal trials or de novo and received 40U DAXI. Those who received repeat treatments could be retreated when they returned to baseline on the Investigator Global Assessment-Frown Wrinkle Severity (IGA-FWS) and Patient FWS (PFWS) scales at/after 12 weeks and up to 36 weeks after treatment. RESULTS High (>96%) response rates (none or mild severity) on the IGA-FWS scale were seen after each of the 3 treatments, with peak response between Weeks 2 to 4. At Week 24, >= 32% had a response of none or mild severity. Peak response rates of >= 92% were observed at Weeks 2 to 4 on the PFWS scale. The median duration for return to moderate or severe severity was 24 weeks. The safety profile was favorable and consistent with previous trials. CONCLUSION DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection efficacy was highly consistent across treatment cycles. These results confirm the previously observed efficacy rates and duration of response.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available