4.7 Article

Permeability anisotropy of methane hydrate-bearing sands: Insights from CT scanning and pore network modelling

Journal

COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS
Volume 123, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103568

Keywords

Permeability anisotropy; Methane hydrate; CT scanning; Pore network modelling

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41907227, 41831280, 41427803]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019 M652478]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gas hydrate formation in porous media is random and inhomogeneous, which causes the permeability to be anisotropic. The absolute and relative anisotropic permeabilities of hydrate-bearing sands at different hydrate saturations were investigated using a CT scanning technique combined with a pore network modelling method. The absolute permeability is directly calculated based on the extracted pore network. The equivalent pore network extracted by a maximum ball (MB) method is used to calculate the relative permeability. The anisotropic permeability coefficient beta(2) becomes increasingly smaller than beta(1) with increasing hydrate saturation, which indicates that the absolute permeability decrease in the y direction is more significant than that in the x direction. The capillary pressure increases with increasing hydrate saturation. The relative permeability in the y direction is highest at 14% hydrate saturation. However, it becomes lowest at 51% hydrate saturation. The anisotropy evolution of the relative permeability is consistent with the evolution of the absolute permeability. Image analysis shows that more hydrates accumulate and distribute in the plane normal to y direction, which will induce the pores to be more irregular and increase the pore anisotropy in this direction. The pore anisotropy will cause the permeability to be anisotropic in different directions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available