4.6 Article

Vasectomy and prostate cancer risk: a meta-analysis of prospective studies

Journal

CARCINOGENESIS
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages 31-37

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgaa086

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Zhejiang Medical and Health Plan Project [2020387714]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Nature Science Foundation of China [LY17H050003]
  3. Pudong New Area Health Commission [PW2016D-13]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This meta-analysis found a significant increase in the risk of prostate cancer among men who underwent vasectomy, with an association also found with the risk of advanced prostate cancer. Further large prospective studies are needed to validate these findings and explore potential underlying molecular mechanisms.
Epidemiological cohort studies investigating the association between vasectomy and prostate cancer risk have yielded inconsistent results. The aim of the present meta-analysis is to update the evidence on the association between vasectomy and prostate cancer. A comprehensively literature search of relevant studies was performed in December 2019 using PubMed. A DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model was used to calculate the summary relative risk (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI). A total of 15 eligible cohort studies (16 data sets) with more than four million of participants were eventually included in this meta-analysis. There was a statistically significant higher risk of prostate cancer among men who underwent vasectomy (RR: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.04-1.13) with obvious heterogeneity among included studies (P < 0.001, I-2 = 64.2%). Vasectomy was also associated with the risk of advanced prostate cancer (RR: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.02-1.13), which is less likely to be affected from detection bias. In conclusion, findings from this meta-analysis of prospective studies indicate that vasectomy may be positively associated with the risk of prostate cancer. Further large prospective studies with long follow-up are warranted to verify the findings from this meta-analysis. In addition, the potential underlying molecular mechanism needed further exploration with in vitro and animal studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available