4.7 Article

Genomic profiling of colorectal cancer with isolated lung metastasis

Journal

CANCER CELL INTERNATIONAL
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12935-020-01373-x

Keywords

Colorectal cancer; Lung metastasis; Whole exome sequencing; Somatic single nucleotide variation; Somatic copy number alteration; Clonal evolution

Categories

Funding

  1. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [7192037]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81972678, 81502137, 81672439, 81872022]
  3. Capital's Funds for Health Improvement and Research [CFH 2018-2-2153]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Metastasis is a major cause of failed colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment. While lung metastasis (LM) is observed in 10-15% of patients with CRC, the genetic mechanisms that cause CRC to metastasize to the lung remain unclear. Methods In this study, we employed whole exome sequencing (WES) of primary CRC tumors and matched isolated LM lesions to compare their genomic profiles. Comprehensive genomic analyses of five freshly frozen primary tumor lesions, five paired LM lesions, and matched non-cancerous tissues was achieved by WES. Results An integrated analysis of somatic mutations, somatic copy number alterations, and clonal structures revealed that genomic alterations were present in primary and metastatic CRCs with various levels of discordance, indicating substantial levels of intertumor heterogeneity. Moreover, our results suggest that the founder clone of the primary tumor was responsible for the formation of the metastatic lesion. Additionally, only a few metastasis-specific mutations were identified, suggesting that LM-promoting mutations might be pre-existing in primary tumors. Conclusions Primary and metastatic CRC show intertumor heterogeneity; however, both lesions were founded by the same clone. These results indicate that malignant clones contributing to disease progression should be identified during the genetic prognosis of cancer metastasis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available