Journal
BOTANICAL REVIEW
Volume 86, Issue 3-4, Pages 180-210Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12229-020-09218-y
Keywords
climbing plants; lianas; vines; climbing mechanisms; standardization; terminology
Categories
Funding
- Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior - Brasil (CAPES) [001]
- Smithsonian Institution
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [133,623/2018-1]
- CNPq [NR-3051139/2016-9]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
In science, standardization of terminology is crucial to make information accessible and allow proper comparison of studies' results. Climbing plants and the climbing habit have been described in numerous ways, frequently with imprecise and dubious terms. We propose a standardization of terms regarding the climbing habit, with special attention to climbing mechanisms. We abide by previous suggestions that the terms primary and secondary hemiepiphyte be substituted by hemiepiphyte and nomadic climber respectively, thus emphasizing the relationship of the latter to the climbing habit. We also suggest that climbing plant or climber be used to describe plants displaying the climbing habit, and liana and vine be left for describing woody and herbaceous climbers respectively. As for climbing mechanisms, we propose an eight-category classification comprised of two major categories: passive climbing, containing scrambling, hooks or grapnels, and adhesive roots; and active climbing, containing twining, tendrils, prehensile branches, twining petioles, and twining inflorescences.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available