4.5 Article

Mechanisms and variances of rotation-induced brain injury: a parametric investigation between head kinematics and brain strain

Journal

BIOMECHANICS AND MODELING IN MECHANOBIOLOGY
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages 2323-2341

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10237-020-01341-4

Keywords

Concussion; Injury mechanism; Impact direction; Rotational velocity; Injury metric

Funding

  1. Canada Research Chairs program [X2281B63]
  2. NSERC [R5748A04]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There lacks a comprehensive understanding of the correlation between head kinematics and brain strain especially deep-brain strain, partially resulting the deficiency of understanding brain injury mechanisms and the difficulty of choosing appropriate brain injury metrics. Hence, we simulated 76 impacts that were focused on concussion-relevant rotational kinematics and evaluated cumulative strain damage measure (CSDM) and average strain that could represent brain strain distribution. For the whole brain, axial rotation induced the highest CSDM, while lateral bending produced the lowest CSDM. However, for the deep-brain components, lateral bending produced the highest CSDM to the corpus callosum and thalamus. We further confirmed that brain strain was mainly produced by rotational kinematics, for which the effect of rotational deceleration could not be ignored with the deceleration influencing CSDM20 up to 27%. Our data supported that peak rotational velocity correlated to brain strain with an average R-2 of 0.77 across various impact directions and different shapes of loading curves. The correlation between peak rotational velocity and brain strain reached to an average R-2 of 0.99 for each specific impact direction. Our results supported using direction-specific peak rotation velocity for predicting strain-related brain injury. Additionally, we highlighted the importance of investigating whole-brain and deep-brain strain, as well as considering rotational deceleration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available