4.4 Article

Modification of French mini-straw plug position for cryopreservation of small doses of bull sperm

Journal

ANIMAL REPRODUCTION SCIENCE
Volume 218, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2020.106485

Keywords

Modified straw; Low sperm numbers; Packaging; Cryosurvival

Funding

  1. Indian Council of Agriculture Research (ICAR), New Delhi, India under project ICAR Incentivizing Research in Agriculture: Project V-Semen Sexing in Cattle

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Greater than optimal diluting of semen for producing a large number of doses containing relatively small numbers of sperm can lead to compromised quality of sperm, post-thawing. In the present study the French mini-straw plug position was modified and the effect of re-positioning was evaluated on the quality of sperm after thawing subsequent to cryopreservation of small doses of sperm. Four types of mini-straws were used based on the position of cotton plug including no plug displacement (Type 1; Manufacturers location for plug-placement in 0.25 mL French mini-straws), and Type II, III, and IV with re-positioning the cotton plug being 2.5, 5, and 7.5 cm, respectively, further from the manufacturer's placement location. Each ejaculate was proportioned into four Aliquots (I, II, III, and IV) and diluted to 80, 60, 40, and 20, million sperm/mL, respectively. Aliquot I was placed in all types of straws, while Aliquots II, III, IV were placed only in Type I straws. Semen straws were equilibrated, cryopreserved and sperm kinetic and functional variables were evaluated post-thawing. The results indicate that in Aliquots III and IV there were lesser (P < 0.05) values for sperm kinetic and function variables compared with sperm from Aliquot I (i.e., unmodified mini-straw). In conclusion, cryopreservation of small doses of sperm in modified French mini-straws resulted in acceptable values for kinetic and function variables, post-thawing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available