4.8 Article

Degradation of Structurally Defined Graphene Nanoribbons by Myeloperoxidase and the Photo-Fenton Reaction

Journal

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
Volume 59, Issue 42, Pages 18515-18521

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202008925

Keywords

biodegradability; carbon materials; hydroxyl radicals; peroxidases; photo-Fenton reaction

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21774076]
  2. Program of the Shanghai Committee of Science and Technology [17JC1403200]
  3. Program of Shanghai Academic Research Leader [19XD1421700]
  4. Program of Distinguished Professor of Special Appointment at Shanghai Institutions of Higher Learning
  5. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) through the LabEx project Chemistry of Complex Systems [ANR-10-LABX-0026_CSC]
  6. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant [734381]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As an emerging member of the graphene family, structurally defined graphene nanoribbons (GNRs) have shown promising applications in various fields. The evaluation of the degradability of GNRs is particularly important for assessing the persistence level and risk of these materials in living organisms and the environment. However, there is a void in the study of the degradation of GNRs. Here, we report the degradation behavior of GNRs in the presence of human myeloperoxidase (hMPO) or treated with the photo-Fenton (PF) reaction. With the assistance of potassium hydroxide or imidazole, which facilitates the dispersion of GNRs in the aqueous solution, GNRs underwent only partial degradation after 25-hour incubation with hMPO, while, the PF reaction degraded GNRs almost completely after 120 hours. These results indicate that structurally precise GNRs can be efficiently degraded under suitable conditions, providing more opportunities for future applications in different fields.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available