4.2 Article

New technical approaches for3Dmorphological imaging and quantification of measurements

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ar.24463

Keywords

deparaffinization; ECi-OTC; ExM; immunolabeling; 3D imaging

Funding

  1. China Scholarship Council [201908080040]
  2. Cooperative Research Training Group: Tissue Analytics for Stem Cell based Diagnostics and Therapy (TASCDT)
  3. H2020 Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions [813839]
  4. Ministry of Science, Research and the Arts Baden-Wurttemberg (MWK)
  5. German Research Foundation (DFG) [INST 35/1314-1 FUGG]
  6. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [813839] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

3D imaging is becoming more and more popular, as it allows us to identify interactions between structures in organs. Furthermore, it gives the possibility to quantify and size these structures. To allow 3D imaging, the tissue sample has to be transparent. This is usually achieved by using optical tissue clearing protocols. Although using optical tissue clearing often results in perfect 3D images, these protocols have some pitfalls, like long duration of sample preparation (up to several weeks), use of toxic substances, damage to antibody staining, fluorescent proteins or dyes, high refractive indices, and high costs of sample processing.Recently we described [Huang et al., Scientific Reports 9(1): 521 (2019)] a fast, safe, and inexpensive ethyl cinnamate (ECi) based optical tissue clearing protocol. Here, we present extensions of our protocol with respect to the deparaffinization of old paraffin-embedded samples allowing 3D imaging of the blocks. In addition, we learned to remove ECi from the samples allowing the use of routine immunolabeling protocols. Furthermore, we demonstrate new pictures of lungs after expansion microscopy and adaptation of already existing protocols. The aim of our work is, in summary, to describe the advances in these methodologies, focusing on the morphological imaging of kidneys and lungs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available