4.6 Article

Crossover to Photodynamic Therapy or Micropulse Laser After Failure of Primary Treatment of Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy: The REPLACE Trial

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 216, Issue -, Pages 80-89

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.04.007

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. STICHTINGMACULAFONDS
  2. RETINA Nederland Onderzoek Fonds
  3. Stichting Blinden-Penning
  4. Algemene Nederlandse Vereniging ter Voorkoming van Blindheid
  5. Landelijke Stichting voor Blinden en Slechtzienden through UitZicht (Delft, the Netherlands)
  6. Rotterdamse Stichting Blindenbelangen (Rotterdam, the Netherlands)
  7. Stichting LeidsOogheelkundigOndersteuningsfonds (Leiden, the Netherlands)
  8. Haagse Stichting Blindenhulp (TheHague, theNetherlands)
  9. Stichting Ooglijders (Rotterdam, the Netherlands)
  10. OxfordNIHR Biomedical Research Centre (Oxford, United Kingdom)
  11. Gisela Thier Fellowship of Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
  12. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (VENI)
  13. Novartis Pharma B.V. (Arnhem, the Netherlands)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE: To assess whether chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (cCSC) patients without a complete resolution of subretinal fluid (SRF) after either half-dose photodynamic therapy (PDT) or high-density subthreshold micropulse laser (HSML) treatment may benefit from crossover treatment. DESIGN: Multicenter prospective interventional case series. METHODS: cCSC patients with persistent SRF at the final visit of the PLACE trial were included. Patients received crossover treatment with either half-dose PDT or HSML. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients received PDT and 10 patients received HSML. At the first evaluation visit (6-8 weeks after treatment), 81% of patients in the PDT group had complete resolution of SRF, while none of the HSML-treated patients had complete resolution of SRF. At final visit (1 year after baseline), 78% (P = .030) and 67% (P = .109) of the patients, respectively, had a complete resolution of SRF. The mean retinal sensitivity in the PDT group increased from 21.7 dB (standard error [SE]: 0.9) to 23.4 dB (SE: 0.8) at evaluation visit 1 (P = .003), to 24.7dB (SE: 0.8) at final visit (P < .001), while there were no significant changes in the HSML group (23.7 dB [SE: 1.6] at baseline, 23.8 dB [SE: 1.4] at evaluation 1, and 23.3 dB [SE: 1.4] at final visit). The mean visual acuity and mean visual quality-of-life questionnaire score did not change significantly in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Crossover to half-dose PDT after previous unsuccessful HSML treatment for cCSC may lead to improved anatomic and functional endpoints, while crossover to HSML after half-dose PDT does not seem to significantly affect these endpoints. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available