4.8 Article

In Situ TEM Study of Radiation Resistance of Metallic Glass-Metal Core-Shell Nanocubes

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 12, Issue 36, Pages 40910-40916

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c10664

Keywords

amorphous coatings; colloidal synthesis; core-shell nanoparticles; radiation stability; nanostructures

Funding

  1. National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate Fellowship
  2. Stanford SystemX Alliance
  3. National Science Foundation [ECCS-1542152]
  4. Division of Materials Science and Engineering, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy
  5. U.S. DOE's National Nuclear Security Administration [DE-NA-0003525]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Radiation damage can cause significantly more surface damage in metallic nanostructures than bulk materials. Structural changes from displacement damage compromise the performance of nanostructures in radiation environments such as nuclear reactors and outer space, or used in radiation therapy for biomedical treatments. As such, it is important to develop strategies to prevent this from occurring if nanostructures are to be incorporated into these applications. Here, in situ transmission electron microscope ion irradiation was used to investigate whether a metallic glass (MG) coating mitigates sputtering and morphological changes in metallic nanostructures. Dislocation-free Au nanocubes and Au nanocubes coated with a Ni-B MG were bombarded with 2.8 MeV Au4+ ions. The formation of internal defects in bare Au nanocubes was observed at a fluence of 7.5 x 10(11) ions/cm(2) (0.008 dpa), and morphological changes such as surface roughening, rounding of corners, and formation of nanofilaments began at 4 x 10(12) ions/cm(2) (0.04 dpa). In contrast, the Ni-B MG-coated Au nanocubes (Au@NiB) showed minimal morphological changes at a fluence of 1.9 x 10(13) ions/cm(2) (0.2 dpa). The MG coating maintains its amorphous nature under all irradiation conditions investigated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available