4.6 Article

Long-term Clinical Outcomes of US-Guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation for Symptomatic Submucosal Fibroids: A Retrospective Comparison with Uterus-Sparing Surgery

Journal

ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 8, Pages 1102-1107

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2020.05.010

Keywords

Uterine fibroids; High-intensity focused ultrasound ablation; Ultrasound imaging; Myomectomy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study compared the long-term clinical outcomes of US-guided HIFU ablation and uterus-sparing surgery for the treatment of symptomatic submucosal fibroids. Results showed that US-guided HIFU ablation had a higher symptom relief rate, lower symptom recurrence rate, and no major complications compared to uterus-sparing surgery.
Rationale and Objectives: Uterus-sparing surgery and ultrasound (US)-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation are both treatment options for symptomatic submucosal fibroids. No study had compared the long-term clinical outcomes between the two techniques. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the long-term clinical outcomes between US-guided HIFU ablation and uterus sparing surgery for the treatment of symptomatic submucosal fibroids. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 245 women who were treated by US-guided HIFU ablation and 129 women who underwent uterus-sparing surgery for type I or type II symptomatic submucosal fibroids in a single institution from January 2007 to January 2015. The mean diameter of the fibroids was about 6 cm in both groups. They were followed up until December 2018. The symptom relief rate, symptom recurrence rate and incidence of major complications were compared between the two groups. Results: The symptom relief rate was 95.9% for US-guided HIFU ablation and 89.1% for uterus-sparing surgery. The cumulative symptom recurrence rate at 1-, 3-, 5-, and 8 years was 1.7%, 6.8%, 9.4%, and 11.9% for US-guided HIFU ablation and 6.1%, 12.2%, 22.6%, and 27.8% for uterus-sparing surgery. Compared to uterus-sparing surgery group, US-guided HIFU ablation had a statistically higher symptom relief rate and a lower symptom recurrence rate (p < 0.05). The major complication rate was 3.1% in the uterus-sparing surgery group. No major complications occurred in the US-guided HIFU ablation group. Conclusion: This study showed that the long-term clinical outcomes of US-guided HIFU ablation may be better that of uterus-sparing surgery for the treatment of symptomatic submucosal fibroids. US-guided HIFU ablation may also be safer than uterus-sparing surgery. Further larger randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available