Reporting Standards for a Bland–Altman Agreement Analysis: A Review of Methodological Reviews
Published 2020 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Reporting Standards for a Bland–Altman Agreement Analysis: A Review of Methodological Reviews
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Diagnostics
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages 334
Publisher
MDPI AG
Online
2020-05-25
DOI
10.3390/diagnostics10050334
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Understanding foreign accent syndrome
- (2019) Laura McWhirter et al. JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY
- A three-dimensional quantification of calcified and non-calcified plaques in coronary arteries based on computed tomography coronary angiography images: Comparison with expert's annotations and virtual histology intravascular ultrasound
- (2019) Vassiliki I. Kigka et al. COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Freehand 3-D Ultrasound Provide Similar Estimates of Free Achilles Tendon Shape and 3-D Geometry
- (2019) Daniel Devaprakash et al. ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
- Use and reporting of Bland–Altman analyses in studies of self-reported versus measured weight and height
- (2019) Katherine M. Flegal et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY
- Assessing Agreement Between Two Methods of Quantitative Measurements: Exact Test Procedure and Sample Size Calculation
- (2019) Gwowen Shieh Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research
- The appropriateness of Bland-Altman’s approximate confidence intervals for limits of agreement
- (2018) Gwowen Shieh BMC Medical Research Methodology
- The Bland-Altman range of agreement: Exact interval procedure and sample size determination
- (2018) Show-Li Jan et al. COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
- Agreement in reporting between trial publications and current clinical trial registry in high impact journals: A methodological review
- (2018) Sarah Daisy Kosa et al. Contemporary Clinical Trials
- Poor statistical reporting, inadequate data presentation and spin persist despite editorial advice
- (2018) Joanna Diong et al. PLoS One
- What makes a biostatistician?
- (2018) Antonia Zapf et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Reporting of method comparison studies: a review of advice, an assessment of current practice, and specific suggestions for future reports
- (2016) A. Abu-Arafeh et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA
- Methodology of method comparison studies evaluating the validity of cardiac output monitors: a stepwise approach and checklist † †This Article is accompanied by Editorial Aew110.
- (2016) L.J. Montenij et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA
- Sample Size for Assessing Agreement between Two Methods of Measurement by Bland−Altman Method
- (2016) Meng-Jie Lu et al.
- Confidence and coverage for Bland–Altman limits of agreement and their approximate confidence intervals
- (2016) Andrew Carkeet et al. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH
- Sample Size for Assessing Agreement between Two Methods of Measurement by Bland−Altman Method
- (2016) Meng-Jie Lu et al. International Journal of Biostatistics
- How to assess intra- and inter-observer agreement with quantitative PET using variance component analysis: a proposal for standardisation
- (2016) Oke Gerke et al. BMC MEDICAL IMAGING
- Intervals for the assessment of measurement agreement: Similarities, differences, and consequences of incorrect interpretations
- (2015) Michael Vock BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL
- Exact Parametric Confidence Intervals for Bland-Altman Limits of Agreement
- (2015) Andrew Carkeet OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE
- Reporting standards for Bland–Altman agreement analysis in laboratory research: a cross-sectional survey of current practice
- (2015) Viswas Chhapola et al. ANNALS OF CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
- Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research
- (2014) Paul Glasziou et al. LANCET
- Improvements in the application and reporting of advanced Bland–Altman methods of comparison
- (2014) Erik Olofsen et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING
- A graphical method for assessing agreement with the mean between multiple observers using continuous measures
- (2011) Mark Jones et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Presenting data: can you follow a recipe?
- (2011) Gordon B. Drummond et al. JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
- Statistics: all together now, one step at a time
- (2011) Gordon B. Drummond et al. JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
- Show the data, don't conceal them
- (2011) G. B. Drummond et al. JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
- Statistical methods for conducting agreement (comparison of clinical tests) and precision (repeatability or reproducibility) studies in optometry and ophthalmology
- (2011) Colm McAlinden et al. OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS
- Confidence interval estimation for the Bland–Altman limits of agreement with multiple observations per individual
- (2011) GY Zou STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH
- Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed
- (2010) Jan Kottner et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Closed-form confidence intervals for functions of the normal mean and standard deviation
- (2010) Allan Donner et al. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH
- Confidence in Altman-Bland plots: A critical review of the method of differences
- (2009) John Ludbrook CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PHARMACOLOGY AND PHYSIOLOGY
- Sample size calculation for an agreement study
- (2009) Jason J. Z. Liao PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS
- A Measure of Confidence in Bland–Altman Analysis for the Interchangeability of Two Methods of Measurement
- (2008) David Preiss et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING
- Reliability analysis for continuous measurements: Equivalence test for agreement
- (2007) Qilong Yi et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started