4.7 Article

Yield and Quality Characteristics of Brassica Microgreens as Affected by the NH4:NO3Molar Ratio and Strength of the Nutrient Solution

Journal

FOODS
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods9050677

Keywords

broccoli; broccoli raab; cauliflower; hydroponic; mineral elements; nitrate; vitamins

Funding

  1. Italian Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microgreens are gaining more and more interest, but little information is available on the effects of the chemical composition of the nutrient solution on the microgreen yield. In this study, threeBrassicagenotypes (B. oleraceavar.italica,B. oleraceavar.botrytis, andBrassica rapaL. subsp.sylvestrisL. Janch. var.esculentaHort) were fertigated with three modified strength Hoagland nutrient solutions (1/2, 1/4, and 1/8 strength) or with three modified half-strength Hoagland nutrient solutions with three different NH4:NO(3)molar ratios (5:95, 15:85, and 25:75). Microgreen yields and content of inorganic ions, dietary fiber, proteins, alpha-tocopherol, and beta-carotene were evaluated. Micro cauliflower showed the highest yield, as well as a higher content of mineral elements and alpha-tocopherol (10.4 mg 100 g(-1)fresh weight (FW)) than other genotypes. The use of nutrient solution at half strength gave both a high yield (0.23 g cm(-2)) and a desirable seedling height. By changing the NH4:NO(3)molar ratio in the nutrient solution, no differences were found on yield and growing parameters, although the highest beta-carotene content (6.3 mg 100 g(-1)FW) was found by using a NH4:NO(3)molar ratio of 25:75. The lowest nitrate content (on average 6.8 g 100 g(-1)dry weight) was found in micro broccoli and micro broccoli raab by using a nutrient solution with NH4:NO(3)molar ratios of 25:75 and 5:95, respectively. Micro cauliflower fertigated with a NH4:NO(3)molar ratio of 25:75 showed the highest dry matter (9.8 g 100 g(-1)FW) and protein content (4.2 g 100 g(-1)FW).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available