4.0 Article

The treatment of neonatal hip dysplasia with splints in the United Kingdom: time for consensus?

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHILDRENS ORTHOPAEDICS
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages 112-117

Publisher

BRITISH EDITORIAL SOC BONE JOINT SURGERY
DOI: 10.1302/1863-2548.14.190156

Keywords

DDH; Pavlik harness; consensus; survey

Funding

  1. National Institute for Health Research Clinician Scientist Award [CS-2014-14-012]
  2. National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [CS-2014-14-012] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose To understand the variation in the management of hip dysplasia identified from the United Kingdom neonatal selective screening programme. Methods Having been designed and tested by the research committee of the British Society for Children's Orthopaedic Surgery (BSCOS), a nationwide online survey was conducted of BSCOS members to ascertain their treatment strategies for neonatal hip dysplasia. Results There were 111 responses (60% of members), which illustrated wide variation in care. In all, 91 (over 80%) of respondents treat more than ten cases per year, yet only 61 (55%) work to an agreed protocol. A total of 90 (81%) use the Graf classification and 103 (93%) use the Pavlik harness initially. Consensus is lacking in key areas including duration of harness use, hours per day, clothing and weaning. Importantly, notable differences of opinion even exist regarding which hip pathologies need treatment. Conclusion This study quantifies the wide variation in many key elements of the initial treatment of neonatal hip dysplasia in the United Kingdom. This variation appears unnecessary and unacceptable as the Getting It Right First Time programme seeks to standardize care pathways. The charitable sector has called for consensus to mitigate parental anxiety, and it has been suggested that this could allow better integration of hip dysplasia into national screening pathways. Standardized care benefits patients and represents the platform from which we can begin understanding effectiveness and optimizing outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available