4.1 Article

What snake is that? Common Australian snake species are frequently misidentified or unidentified

Journal

HUMAN DIMENSIONS OF WILDLIFE
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages 517-530

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10871209.2020.1769778

Keywords

Venomous snake; identification; public perception; human-wildlife conflict; reptile

Funding

  1. Australian Federal Government

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human-wildlife conflicts are influenced by the public's ability to identify dangerous species. We determined the snakes most commonly involved in conflicts by comparing types of problem snakes by location (urban/non-urban) for 9,627 calls to a Western Australian helpline. Of the 21% of cases identifying problem snakes, most urban sightings (82%) were for venomous brown snakes (Pseudonajaspp.) and tiger snakes (Notechis scutatus). We then tested the ability of Western Australians to discern dangerous species by displaying five common reptiles (brown snake/dugite, tiger snake, python, and two skinks) at four community events and asked attendees what is it called, is it a snake, and is it venomous? Respondents discerned snakes and lizards, but not species or venomous versus non-venomous. Adults correctly identified dugites more often than did children (82% and 48%, respectively). We recommend education (e.g., brochures, school programs) to help people identify and assess the danger of interacting with reptiles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available