4.6 Article

Optimizing the Extraction of Polysaccharides from Bletilla ochracea Schltr. Using Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and Evaluating their Antioxidant Activity

Journal

PROCESSES
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pr8030341

Keywords

Bletilla ochracea Schltr. polysaccharide; response surface methodology (RSM); antioxidant activities

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81571834, 31670299]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [GK201906008, 2019CSLY028]
  3. National Key Technologies R&D Program for Modernization of Traditional Chinese Medicine [2017YFC1701300, 2017YFC1700706]
  4. Key R&D Program of Shaanxi Province [2019SF-307]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bletilla ochracea Schltr. polysaccharides (BOP) have a similar structure to Bletilla striata (Thunb.) Reichb.f. (Orchidaceae) polysaccharides (BSP). Therefore, BOP can be considered as a substitute for BSP in the food, pharmaceuticals and cosmetics fields. To the best of our knowledge, little information is available regarding the optimization of extraction and antioxidant activity of BOP. In this study, response surface methodology (RSM) was firstly used for optimizing the extraction parameters of BOP. The results suggested that the optimal conditions included a temperature of 82 degrees C, a duration of 85 min and a liquid/material ratio of 30 mL/g. In these conditions, we received 26.45% +/- 0.18% as the experimental yield. In addition, BOP exhibited strong concentration-dependent antioxidant abilities in vitro. The half-maximal effective concentration (EC50) values of BOP against 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH center dot), 2,20-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonate) (ABTS(+)center dot), hydroxyl (center dot OH) and superoxide anion (center dot O-2(-)) radicals and ferrous ions (Fe2+) were determined as 692.16, 224.09, 542.22, 600.53 and 515.70 mu g/mL, respectively. In conclusion, our results indicate that BOP can be a potential natural antioxidant, deserving further investigation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available