4.4 Article

Modeling subgrid-scale forces by spatial artificial neural networks in large eddy simulation of turbulence

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW FLUIDS
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevFluids.5.054606

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [91952104, 11702127, 91752201]
  2. Technology and Innovation Commission of Shenzhen Municipality [KQTD20180411143441009, JCYJ20170412151759222, ZDSYS201802081843517]
  3. Center for Computational Science and Engineering of the Southern University of Science and Technology
  4. Young Elite Scientist Sponsorship Program by CAST [2016QNRC001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Spatial artificial neural network (ANN) models are developed for subgrid-scale (SGS) forces in the large eddy simulation (LES) of turbulence. The input features are based on the first-order derivatives of the filtered velocity field at different spatial locations. The correlation coefficients of SGS forces predicted by the spatial artifical neural network (SANN) models with reasonable spatial stencil geometry can be made larger than 0.99 in an a priori analysis, and the relative error of SGS forces can be made smaller than 15%, much smaller than that of the traditional gradient model. In a posteriori analysis, a detailed comparison is made on the results of LES using the SANN model, implicit large eddy simulation (ILES), the dynamic Smagorinsky model (DSM), and the dynamic mixed model (DMM) at grid resolution of 64(3). It is shown that the SANN model performs better than the ILES, DSM, and DMM models in the prediction of the spectrum and other statistical properties of the velocity field, as well as the instantaneous flow structures. These results suggest that artificial neural network with consideration of spatial characteristics is a very effective tool for developing advanced SGS models in LES of turbulence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available