4.6 Article

Paper-Based Device for Naked Eye Urinary Albumin/Creatinine Ratio Evaluation

Journal

ACS SENSORS
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages 1110-1118

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssensors.0c00050

Keywords

paper-based analytical device; microfluidic; distance-based; naked eye; albumin index; colorimetry

Funding

  1. Chang Gung Memorial Hospital [CORPG3I0041]
  2. National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan [CORPG3I0041]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces the concept of Drawing-PADS (Drawing paper-based microfluidic analytical devices) allowing to intuitively evaluate the urinary albumin (Alb) index, a clinically important parameter used for the early detection of renal deficiencies related to diabetes, among others. To enable regular monitoring of the Alb index, a simple examination method suitable for self-diagnosis is highly desirable. The Drawing-PADs rely on the simultaneous naked eye detection of Alb and creatinine (Cre) on a single device according to the distance-based microfluidic PAD (mu PAD) approach. The Alb index is visualized by simply drawing a straight line connecting the top of two colorchanged assay channel sections (Alb and Cre channels), followed by visually confirming the position of the intercept of the drawn straight line. The semiquantitative Alb index evaluation performed with Drawing-PADs does not require any equipment such as a camera, software, or a color reference chart. The obtained results are independent of the sample volume and are not influenced by changes in the absolute Alb and Cre concentrations caused by urine excretion variations, making spot urine assays possible. Classification of Alb index values according to clinically relevant criteria (normoalbuminuria, microalbuminuria, and macroalbuminuria) is readily achieved within 15 min and has been validated for 15 human urine samples including diabetic patients and healthy volunteers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available