4.7 Article

Effects of grain structure related precipitation on corrosion behavior and corrosion fatigue property of Al-Mg-Si alloy

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY-JMR&T
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages 5391-5402

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.03.065

Keywords

Al-Mg-Si alloy; Grain structure related precipitation; Corrosion; Corrosion fatigue

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [No2016YFB0300901]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An Al-Mg-Si alloy with three types of grain structure (fully, partly, and none recrystallized grains) were prepared to determine the effects of grain structure related precipitation on corrosion resistance and corrosion fatigue property in this paper. Corrosion immersion tests, corrosion fatigue tests were conducted for the purpose. Through the investigations, a mechanism different from the existent mechanisms for expounding the corrosion behavior of Al-Mg-Si alloys is proposed in this paper. It was found that low angel grain boundaries (LAGBs) with continuous Mg-Si segregation play a dominant role on the penetration depth of corrosion; while the intragranular dislocations induced precipitates determine the corrosion morphology on the surface of the sample; in addition, the high angel grain boundaries (HAGBs) and precipitation free zones (PFZs) in the periphery do not decrease the corrosion resistance of the experimental alloy in the conditions of this paper. Furthermore, a deeper penetration of corrosion rather than the severer attack of corrosion on the surface results in a shorter corrosion fatigue life, as well as a corrosion dominated fracture failure during corrosion fatigue tests.These results may supplement the existing corrosion mechanisms of Al-Mg-Si alloy. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available