4.6 Article

Binder-Free Charantia-Like Metal-Oxide Core/Shell Nanotube Arrays for High-Performance Lithium-Ion Anodes

Journal

FRONTIERS IN CHEMISTRY
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2020.00159

Keywords

carbon fabric; TiO2 nanotube arrays; alpha-Fe2O3 hollow nanospheres; lithium-ion batteries; anodes

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71401106]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai [14ZR1418700]
  3. Shanghai University of Engineering Science Innovation Fund [18KY0504]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The performance of anodes of lithium-ion batteries relies largely on the architecture and composition of the hybrid active materials. We present a two-step, seed-free, solution-based method for the direct growth of hierarchical charantia-like TiO2/Fe2O3 core/shell nanotube arrays on carbon cloth substrates. An ultrahigh loading of the nanomaterial on carbon fibers was achieved with this method without the use of a binder. This three-dimensional porous hollow architecture and its direct contact with the CC current collector ensure an efficient electronic pathway. The hollow TiO2 framework effectively protects the hierarchical charantia-like TiO2/Fe2O3 hollow core/shell arrays from collapsing because of its negligible volume change during cycling. Meanwhile, the self-assembled alpha-Fe2O3 hollow nanospheres guarantee a large capacity and contact area with the electrolyte. This flexible anode with a 3D porous charantia-like hollow architecture exhibits high cycle performance, reversible capacity, and rate capability. These nanotube arrays maintain a high reversible capacity of 875 mAh g(-1) after 200 cycles at a current density of 200 mA g(-1). This simple, cost-effective, and scalable electrode fabrication strategy can be implemented in the fabrication of high-performance wearable energy storage devices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available