3.8 Article

Enzymatically Cross-Linked Poly(γ-glutamic acid) Hydrogel with Enhanced Tissue Adhesive Property

Journal

ACS BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages 3103-3113

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c00411

Keywords

poly(gamma-glutamic acid); injectable hydrogel; dopamine; adhesive property; tissue adhesives

Funding

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning [2018R1A2A2A05021100]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2018R1A2A2A05021100] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Enzymatic cross-linking of polymer-catechol conjugates in the presence of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) and H2O2 has emerged as an important method to fabricate in situ-forming, injectable hydrogels. Subsequently, tissue adhesion studies using catechol-containing polymers were extensively reported. However, because of the presence of numerous variables such as polymer concentration, oxidizing agent/enzyme, and stoichiometry, the design of the polymer with optimized tissue adhesive property is still challenging. In this study, a poly(gamma-glutamic acid) (gamma-PGA)-dopamine (PGADA) conjugate was synthesized, and in situ hydrogels were fabricated via enzymatic cross-linking of a catechol moiety. To optimize the tissue adhesive property of the PGADA hydrogel, the effect of various factors, such as polymer concentration, catechol substitution degree (DS), HRP concentration, and H2O2 content, on the gelation behavior and mechanical strength was investigated. The gelation behavior of PGADA hydrogels was characterized using a rheometer and rotational viscometer. Also, the possibility of its use as a tissue adhesive was examined by evaluating the tissue adhesion strength in vitro and ex vivo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available