4.5 Article

The Robustness of the Gray Level Co-Occurrence Matrices and X-Ray Computed Tomography Method for the Quantification of 3D Mineral Texture

Journal

MINERALS
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/min10040334

Keywords

X-ray computed tomography; gray level co-occurrence matrices; mineral texture; 3D data analysis; mineralogy

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of South Africa [86054, 99005]
  2. NRF
  3. South African Minerals to Metals Research Institute
  4. Department of Science and Innovation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mineral textural quantification methods have become critical in both geosciences and mineral processing as mineral texture is a critical factor contributing to ore variability. However, the lack of objective mineral texture classification has made quantification difficult. The aim of this study is therefore to investigate the robustness of applying the gray level co-occurrence matrices (GLCM) to 3-dimensional (3D) gray scale images measured by X-ray computed tomography (XCT) for the quantification of mineral texture in 3D. The data quality of the GLCM outputs like statistics, heat maps and histograms in response to changes in XCT conditions such as artefacts, resolution, and calibration was tested. The response of the GLCM outputs with respect to different mineral texture types with anisotropic features and inter-sample variability was also explored. The methodology included testing core sizes of 26, 19, 14, and 6 mm diameter. Calibration was tested using copper and tungsten wires. The study demonstrated the versatility of the method for different sample types. Inter-sample calibration and optimal scanning conditions (quality and integrity) were also demonstrated, and a basic link between the 3D GLCM statistical descriptors with the mineral texture features of rocks was established. The 3D mineral texture method can potentially bypass the XCT segmentation process for direct automation of 3D mineral texture information.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available