4.7 Article

Genetic stratification of depression in UK Biobank

Journal

TRANSLATIONAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41398-020-0848-0

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Sir Henry Wellcome Postdoctoral Fellowship [213674/Z/18/Z]
  2. 2018 NARSAD Young Investigator Grant from the Brain & Behavior Research Foundation [27404]
  3. Wellcome Trust (Wellcome Trust Strategic Award 'STratifying Resilience and Depression Longitudinally' (STRADL)) [104036/Z/14/Z]
  4. The Sackler Trust
  5. NMHRC [1078901, 1087889]
  6. MRC [MR/N015746/1, MR/S0151132]
  7. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
  8. King's College London
  9. Wellcome Trust [213674/Z/18/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  10. MRC [MR/N015746/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Depression is a common and clinically heterogeneous mental health disorder that is frequently comorbid with other diseases and conditions. Stratification of depression may align sub-diagnoses more closely with their underling aetiology and provide more tractable targets for research and effective treatment. In the current study, we investigated whether genetic data could be used to identify subgroups within people with depression using the UK Biobank. Examination of cross-locus correlations were used to test for evidence of subgroups using genetic data from seven other complex traits and disorders that were genetically correlated with depression and had sufficient power (>0.6) for detection. We found no evidence for subgroups within depression for schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, autism spectrum disorder, anorexia nervosa, inflammatory bowel disease or obesity. This suggests that for these traits, genetic correlations with depression were driven by pleiotropic genetic variants carried by everyone rather than by a specific subgroup.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available