4.2 Review

Plasticity and dystonia: a hypothesis shrouded in variability

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 238, Issue 7-8, Pages 1611-1617

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-020-05773-3

Keywords

Dystonia; Plasticity; Neurophysiology; Pathophysiology

Categories

Funding

  1. Chadburn Clinical Lectureship
  2. Royal Society Grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Studying plasticity mechanisms with Professor John Rothwell was a shared highlight of our careers. In this article, we discuss non-invasive brain stimulation techniques which aim to induce and quantify plasticity, the mechanisms and nature of their inherent variability and use such observations to review the idea that excessive and abnormal plasticity is a pathophysiological substrate of dystonia. We have tried to define the tone of our review by a couple of Professor John Rothwell's many inspiring characteristics; his endless curiosity to refine knowledge and disease models by scientific exploration and his wise yet humble readiness to revise scientific doctrines when the evidence is supportive. We conclude that high variability of response to non-invasive brain stimulation plasticity protocols significantly clouds the interpretation of historical findings in dystonia research. There is an opportunity to wipe the slate clean of assumptions and armed with an informative literature in health, re-evaluate whether excessive plasticity has a causal role in the pathophysiology of dystonia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available