4.6 Article

Wood-Gelatin Bio-Composite Membranes with Tunable Flux

Journal

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
Volume 8, Issue 18, Pages 7205-7213

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c01856

Keywords

Biobased materials; Natural resources; Protein; Tunable membrane; Biodegradable; Composite separation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Wood is an attractive bioresource for the production of functional materials, as it provides a complex hierarchical structure with unique properties. It is particularly promising for membrane applications due to its aligned micropores, which enable directed flow of liquids. However, wood-based functional membranes often rely on the combination of wood with nonecofriendly compounds or production methods. Furthermore, the performance of such membranes is predetermined by wood's intrinsic porosity, which cannot be regulated. Here we present a green sustainable biocomposite material for an application as tunable membrane by the combination of beech wood and gelatin. Investigation of the composite material with electron microscopy, X-ray microtomography, as well as FTIR-and Raman-spectroscopy shows, that the gelatin is distributed inside the cell lumina as thin film at the cell wall/lumen interface. The thickness of this film is tunable by the feed gelatin concentration. Furthermore, the gelatin forms meniscus-like structures that block vessels and hence impede capillary water transport through the wood structure. As a result, the flux of wood-gelatin composite membranes is tunable by both the sample thickness and the gelatin loading. The composites offer straightforward separation of wood and gelatin by immersion in warm water. Therefore, separate reuse or recycling of the constituents is possible. Due to its adjustability and eco-friendliness, the developed biocomposite provides a sustainable and versatile platform for membrane applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available