4.6 Article

Green Synthesis and Fractionation of Cellulose Acetate by Controlling the Reactivity of Polysaccharides in Sugarcane Bagasse

Journal

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
Volume 8, Issue 24, Pages 9002-9008

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c01639

Keywords

lignocellulosic biomass; cellulose; hemicellulose; transesterification; ionic Liquid

Funding

  1. Center of Innovation Science and Technologybased Radical Innovation and Entrepreneurship Program (COI stream) [JPMJCE1315]
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT)
  3. Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A green synthetic protocol was developed to prepare cellulose acetate (CA) directly from sugarcane bagasse without using any pretreatments or corrosive reagents, such as strong acids, bases, or halogenated chemicals. The key in this method is to control the reactivities of cellulose and xylan-based hemicellulose in bagasse under mild conditions, making their solubilities in acetone different. Homogeneous transesterification was performed for bagasse at SO degrees C using isopropenyl acetate as an acetyl donor and 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate as a solvent and catalyst. By controlling the reaction temperature, the degree of substitution for cellulose was adjusted to 2.5-2.8 to maintain solubility in acetone, while the acetylation of hemicellulose was suppressed to prevent its dissolution in acetone. In the subsequent fractionation process, the hemicellulose-rich component was first precipitated in acetone and removed by filtration. The filtrate was subsequently separated into lignin- and cellulose-rich fractions by solid-liquid separation using methanol. Then, CA as the target compound was collected as the acetone-soluble and methanol-insoluble fraction, with a sufficiently high purity (similar to 90%), according to FT-IR and H-1 NMR analyses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available