4.3 Article

Impact of Electronic Alternatives to Tobacco Cigarettes on Indoor Air Particular Matter Levels

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17082947

Keywords

indoor air; particulate matter; electronic cigarettes; heat-not-burn products; IQOS (R); GLO (R); JUUL (R); passive smoking

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An aerosol study was carried out in a test room measuring particulate matter (PM) with an aerodynamic diameter smaller than 10, 4, 2.5 and 1 mu m (PM10, PM4, PM2.5, PM1) before and during the use of electronic alternatives to tobacco cigarettes (EATC) IQOS (R), GLO (R), JUUL (R), with different kinds of sticks/pods, as well as during the smoking of a conventional tobacco cigarette. The aerosol was mainly in the PM1 size range (>95%). All studied EATCs caused lower indoor PM1 concentrations than conventional tobacco cigarettes. Nevertheless, they determined a worsening of indoor-PM1 concentration that ranged from very mild for JUUL (R)-depending on the pod used-to considerably severe for IQOS (R) and GLO (R). Median values ranged from 11.00 (Iqos3 and Juul2) to 337.5 mu g m(-3) (Iqos4). The high variability of particle loadings was attributed both to the type of stick/pod used and to the different way of smoking of volunteers who smoked/vaped during the experiments. Moreover, during vaping IQOS (R) and GLO (R) indoor PM1 concentrations reach levels by far higher than outdoor concentrations that range from 14 to 21 mu g m(-3), especially during the exhalation of the smoke. From these results emerge an urgent need of a legislative regulation limiting the use of such devices in public places.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available