4.5 Article

Fragment-Based Protein-Protein Interaction Antagonists of a Viral Dimeric Protease

Journal

CHEMMEDCHEM
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages 862-869

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cmdc.201500526

Keywords

dimer disruption; fragment-based screening; human herpesviruses; NMR spectroscopy; proteases

Funding

  1. US National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01-AI090592, 1F32M111012-01]
  2. NIH Structural Biology Training Grant [GM008284]
  3. National Science Foundation [1144247]
  4. National Center for Research Resources
  5. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NIH), through the UCSF Clinical and Translational Science Institute (CTSI) [UL1 TR000004, UL1 RR024131]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fragment-based drug discovery has shown promise as an approach for challenging targets such as protein-protein interfaces. We developed and applied an activity-based fragment screen against dimeric Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus protease (KSHV Pr) using an optimized fluorogenic substrate. Dose-response determination was performed as a confirmation screen, and NMR spectroscopy was used to map fragment inhibitor binding to KSHV Pr. Kinetic assays demonstrated that several initial hits also inhibit human cytomegalovirus protease (HCMV Pr). Binding of these hits to HCMV Pr was also confirmed by NMR spectroscopy. Despite the use of a target-agnostic fragment library, more than 80% of confirmed hits disrupted dimerization and bound to a previously reported pocket at the dimer interface of KSHV Pr, not to the active site. One class of fragments, an aminothiazole scaffold, was further explored using commercially available analogues. These compounds demonstrated greater than 100-fold improvement of inhibition. This study illustrates the power of fragment-based screening for these challenging enzymatic targets and provides an example of the potential druggability of pockets at protein-protein interfaces.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available