4.7 Article

Intravenous immune globulin and thromboembolic adverse events in patients with hematologic malignancy

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 127, Issue 2, Pages 200-207

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2015-05-647552

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P30 CA086862, HHSN261201000034C, HHSN261201000035I, HHSN261201000035C, HHSN261201000140C] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS048597] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NCCDPHP CDC HHS [U58DP003862-01, U58 DP003862] Funding Source: Medline
  4. FDA HHS [HHSF223200910006I] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In patients with hypogammaglobulinemia secondary to chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or multiple myeloma(MM), intravenous immune globulin (IVIg) may be administered to reduce the risk of infection. Since 2013, IVIg products have carried a boxed safety warning about the risk of thromboembolic events (TEEs), with TEEs reported in 0.5% to 15% of patients treated with IVIg. In this retrospective cohort study of older patients with CLL or MM identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare Linked Database, we assessed rates of clinically serious TEEs in 2724 new users of IVIg and a propensity-matched comparison group of 8035 nonusers. For the primary end point, arterial TEE, we observed a transient increased risk of TEE during the day of an IVIg infusion and the day afterward (hazard ration = 3.40; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.25, 9.25); this risk declined over the remainder of the 30-day treatment cycle. When considered in terms of absolute risk averaged over a 1-year treatment period, the increase in risk attributable to IVIg was estimated to be 0.7% (95% CI: -0.2%, 2.0%) compared with a baseline risk of 1.8% for the arterial TEE end point. A statistically nonsignificant risk increase of 0.3% (95% CI: -0.4%, 1.5%) compared with a baseline risk of 1.1% was observed for the venous TEE end point. Further research is needed to establish the generalizability of these results to patients receiving higher doses of IVIg for other indications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available