4.7 Article

Rhizosphere assisted biodegradation of benzo(a)pyrene by cadmium resistant plant-probiotic Serratia marcescens S2I7, and its genomic traits

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-62285-4

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Department of Biotechnology (DBT)
  2. Department of Science and Technology (DST)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Melia azedarach-rhizosphere mediated degradation of benzo(a)pyrene (BaP), in the presence of cadmium (Cd) was studied, using efficient rhizobacterial isolate. Serratia marcescens S2I7, isolated from the petroleum-contaminated site, was able to tolerate up to 3.25 mM Cd. In the presence of Cd, the isolate S2I7 exhibited an increase in the activity of stress-responsive enzyme, glutathione-S-transferase. Gas Chromatography-Mass spectroscopy analysis revealed up to 59% in-vitro degradation of BaP after 21 days, while in the presence of Cd, the degradation was decreased by 14%. The bacterial isolate showed excellent plant growth-promoting attributes and could enhance the growth of host plant in Cd contaminated soil. The 52,41,555 bp genome of isolate S. marcescens S2I7 was sequenced, assembled and annotated into 4694 genes. Among these, 89 genes were identified for the metabolism of aromatic compounds and 172 genes for metal resistance, including the efflux pump system. A 2 MB segment of the genome was identified to contain operons for protocatechuate degradation, catechol degradation, benzoate degradation, and an IclR type regulatory protein pcaR, reported to be involved in the regulation of protocatechuate degradation. A pot trial was performed to validate the ability of S2I7 for rhizodegradation of BaP when applied through Melia azedarach rhizosphere. The rhizodegradation of BaP was significantly higher when augmented with S2I7 (85%) than degradation in bulk soil (68%), but decreased in the presence of Cd (71%).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available