4.7 Article

Association between Dietary Habits and Physical Function in Brazilian and Italian Older Women

Journal

NUTRIENTS
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu12061635

Keywords

physical performance; sarcopenia; frailty; nutrition; protein intake

Funding

  1. Innovative Medicines Initiative-Joint Undertaking [IMI-JU] [115621]
  2. nonprofit research foundation Centro Studi Achille e Linda Lorenzon
  3. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior [CAPES] [001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study investigated and compared the patterns of dietary protein intake and physical function in Brazilian and Italian older women. Seventy-five Brazilian older women were recruited in a community senior center. Fifty-three age-matched Italian older women were selected from participants of the Longevity check-up (Lookup) 7+ study. In both samples, physical performance was evaluated by isometric handgrip strength (IHG) and five-time sit-to-stand (5 x STS) tests, while diet was assessed through 24-h recall. Results indicated that Brazilian women had a higher intake of plant-based protein (52.7% vs. 30.5% kcal), while Italian women consumed greater amounts of animal-derived protein (29.7% vs. 41.5% kcal). In Brazilian women, the binary logistic regression analysis indicated that body weight-adjusted protein consumption was associated with IHG adjusted by body mass index and with 5 x STS performance. In the Italian sample, the intake of isoleucine, leucine, and valine was significantly associated with 5 x STS performance. Our findings indicate that Brazilian and Italian community-dwelling older women show different patterns of protein intake, with higher consumption of plant-based protein in the Brazilian sample and higher ingestion of animal-derived protein in the Italian subgroup. These dietary patterns may differentially impact the relationship between physical function and protein intake observed in Brazilian and Italian older women.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available