4.6 Article

Removal of Trichloroethylene by Sulfide-Modified Nanoscale Zerovalent Iron Coated with Different Stabilizers in Aqueous Solution

Journal

WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION
Volume 231, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/s11270-020-04550-w

Keywords

Dispersion stability; Nanoscale zerovalent iron; Reactivity; Sulfidation; Surface stabilizer; Trichloroethylene degradation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51879100]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the dispersion stability and reactivity of sulfide-modified nanoscale zerovalent iron (SNZVI) coated with different surface stabilizers (i.e., starch, sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate (SDBS), or carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC)) were investigated. All the three types of surface stabilizers could enhance the dispersion stability of SNZVI but exerted differing influences on the reactivity toward trichloroethylene (TCE) removal. The coating of starch on SNZVI markedly improved TCE removal, which was positively correlated with the enhanced dispersion stability (i.e., more active surface sites). However, although the SDBS and CMC could enhance the dispersion stability of SNZVI, they resulted in an inhibition in TCE removal, especially for CMC. It was presumed that the coated SDBS/CMC on the surface of SNZVI occupied the active surface sites for TCE removal. Besides, the effect of groundwater geochemistry (i.e., pH, Ca2+, and humic acid (HA)) was examined. The increasing pH from 5 to 9 led to a slight decrease for all stabilized SNZVI particles. The presence of Ca2+ or HA exerted distinct influence on the TCE removal by the three stabilized SNZVI. The Ca2+/HA exerted an insignificant effect on the reactivity of CMC-SNZVI but markedly decreased the reactivity of starch-SNZVI and SDBS-SNZVI. The varying effects of Ca2+/HA should be due to their distinct interactions with different types of stabilizers on the surface of SNZVI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available