4.1 Article

An adaptive filtering algorithm of multilevel resolution point cloud

Journal

SURVEY REVIEW
Volume 53, Issue 379, Pages 300-311

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00396265.2020.1755163

Keywords

Adaptive filtering; Airborne LiDAR; Double index; Oblique angle; Multilevel resolution

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China [ZR2019PD016]
  2. Innovation Training Program for college students of shandong province China [S201910424051]
  3. Major Science and Technology Innovation Projects of Shandong Province, China [2019JZZY020103]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An adaptive filtering algorithm based on multilevel resolution algorithm is proposed for airborne LiDAR point cloud, providing high accuracy. Experimental results show significant advantages in reducing Type II errors, increasing Kappa coefficient, and decreasing total error rate compared to other algorithms.
The existing filtering methods for airborne LiDAR point cloud have low accuracy. An adaptive filtering algorithm is proposed which is improved based on multilevel resolution algorithm. First double index structure of Octree and KDtree is established. Then the initial reference surface is constructed by ground seed points. According to the slope fluctuation situation, the grid resolution of the ground referential surface is adjusted in an adaptive way. Finally, the refined surface is formed gradually by multilevel renewing resolution to provide filtered point cloud with high accuracy. Experimental results show that the error of Type II can be effectively reduced, the average Kappa coefficient increases by 0.53% and the average total error decreases by 0.44% compared with multiresolution hierarchical classification algorithm. The result tested by practically measured data shows that Kappa coefficient can reach 90%. Especially, it maintains advantages of high accuracy under complex topographic environment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available