4.6 Article

Numerical Modeling and Investigation of Amperometric Biosensors with Perforated Membranes

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 20, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s20102910

Keywords

amperometric biosensor; biosensor current; finite element method; half-time response; mathematical model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present paper aims to investigate the influence of perforated membrane geometry on the performance of biosensors. For this purpose, a 2-D axisymmetric model of an amperometric biosensor is analyzed. The governing equations describing the reaction-diffusion equations containing a nonlinear term related to the Michaelis-Menten kinetics of the enzymatic reaction are introduced. The partial differential governing equations, along with the boundary conditions, are first non-dimensionalized by using appropriate dimensionless variables and then solved in a non-uniform unstructured grid by employing the Galerkin Finite Element Method. To examine the impact of the hole-geometry of the perforated membrane, seven different geometries-including cylindrical, upward circular cone, downward circular cone, upward paraboloid, downward paraboloid, upward concave paraboloid, and downward concave paraboloid-are studied. Moreover, the effects of the perforation level of the perforated membrane, the filling level of the enzyme on the transient and steady-state current of the biosensor, and the half-time response are presented. The results of the simulations show that the transient and steady-state current of the biosensor are affected by the geometry dramatically. Thus, the sensitivity of the biosensor can be influenced by different hole-geometries. The minimum and maximum output current can be obtained from the cylindrical and upward concave paraboloid holes. On the other hand, the least half-time response of the biosensor can be obtained in the cylindrical geometry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available