4.8 Article

Control of brain tumor growth by reactivating myeloid cells with niacin

Journal

SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
Volume 12, Issue 537, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aay9924

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Alberta Innovates-Health Solutions (AIHS)
  2. Alberta Cancer Foundation
  3. Ronald and Irene Ward Foundation
  4. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  5. Brain Canada platform grant
  6. Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship
  7. University of Calgary Eyes High postdoctoral scholarship
  8. AIHS
  9. Branch Out Neurological Foundation
  10. CIHR
  11. ACHRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Glioblastomas are generally incurable partly because monocytes, macrophages, and microglia in afflicted patients do not function in an antitumor capacity. Medications that reactivate these macrophages/microglia, as well as circulating monocytes that become macrophages, could thus be useful to treat glioblastoma. We have discovered that niacin (vitamin B3) is a potential stimulator of these inefficient myeloid cells. Niacin-exposed monocytes attenuated the growth of brain tumor-initiating cells (BTICs) derived from glioblastoma patients by producing anti-proliferative interferon-alpha 14. Niacin treatment of mice bearing intracranial BTICs increased macrophage/microglia representation within the tumor, reduced tumor size, and prolonged survival. These therapeutic outcomes were negated in mice depleted of circulating monocytes or harboring interferon-alpha receptor-deleted BTICs. Combination treatment with temozolomide enhanced niacin-promoted survival. Monocytes from glioblastoma patients had increased interferon-alpha 14 upon niacin exposure and were reactivated to reduce BTIC growth in culture. We highlight niacin, a common vitamin that can be quickly translated into clinical application, as an immune stimulator against glioblastomas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available