4.7 Article

Preparation of a 3D multi-branched chelate adsorbent for high selective adsorption of uranium(VI): Acrylic and diaminomaleonitrile functionalized waste hemp fiber

Journal

REACTIVE & FUNCTIONAL POLYMERS
Volume 149, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2020.104512

Keywords

Waste hemp fiber; Amidoxime; Adsorption; Uranium adsorption; Mechanism

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC 21905066]
  2. NSFC-Nuclear Technology Innovation Joint Fund [U1967214]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M663415]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province [QC2018010]
  5. International Science & Technology Cooperation Program of China [2015DFR50050]
  6. Defense Industrial Technology Development Program [JCKY2018604C011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Uranium(VI) is an important strategic resource in the development of nuclear energy with 4.5 billion tons in the seawater. However, because of the low concentration of U(VI) and the presence of multiple competing ions in seawater. It is a significant challenge for extracting U(VI) from seawater. In this study, a series of multi-branched HF-PAA-AO(n(n=1,2,3,4,5)) adsorption materials were prepared for the extraction of U(VI) from solution, and the adsorption properties of the adsorbents were investigated by batch experiments. The experimental results indicated that the HF-PAA-AO(5) material exhibits an excellent removal rate and the maximum adsorption capacity of HF-PAA-AO(5) is of 550.28 mg/g. Moreover, the adsorbent still maintains a high adsorption efficiency after five adsorption-desorption recycles. Meanwhile, the adsorbent showed superior selectivity and adsorption properties (removal rate > 89%) in modified artificial seawater. Therefore, the HF-PAA-AO(5) composite is considered to be a favorable potential adsorbent for capturing U(VI) from seawater.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available