Estimating the deep replicability of scientific findings using human and artificial intelligence
Published 2020 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Estimating the deep replicability of scientific findings using human and artificial intelligence
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Volume 117, Issue 20, Pages 10762-10768
Publisher
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Online
2020-05-05
DOI
10.1073/pnas.1909046117
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Predicting the replicability of social science lab experiments
- (2019) Adam Altmejd et al. PLoS One
- Science of science
- (2018) Santo Fortunato et al. SCIENCE
- Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review
- (2017) Andrew Tomkins et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases
- (2017) Aylin Caliskan et al. SCIENCE
- 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility
- (2016) Monya Baker NATURE
- Association between contextual dependence and replicability in psychology may be spurious
- (2016) Yoel Inbar PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Contextual sensitivity in scientific reproducibility
- (2016) Jay J. Van Bavel et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics
- (2016) C. F. Camerer et al. SCIENCE
- Using prediction markets to estimate the reproducibility of scientific research
- (2015) Anna Dreber et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
- (2015) SCIENCE
- The Economics of Reproducibility in Preclinical Research
- (2015) Leonard P. Freedman et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Evaluating link prediction methods
- (2014) Yang Yang et al. KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS
- Bias in peer review
- (2012) Carole J. Lee et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Raise standards for preclinical cancer research
- (2012) C. Glenn Begley et al. NATURE
- Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets?
- (2011) Florian Prinz et al. NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY
- Scientific Research and the Public Trust
- (2010) David B. Resnik SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS
- Extending IP to Low-Power, Wireless Personal Area Networks
- (2008) Jonathan W. Hui et al. IEEE INTERNET COMPUTING
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started