4.7 Article

Evaluation of particle shape, size and magnetic field intensity for targeted delivery efficiency and plaque injury in treating atherosclerosis

Journal

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
Volume 366, Issue -, Pages 63-72

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2020.02.003

Keywords

Atherosclerosis; Magnetic nanoparticle drug delivery; Drag coefficient of hemodynamics; Delivery efficiency; Plaque injury

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundations of China [11772046, 81870345]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A comprehensive evaluation of therapeutic effects of magnetic nanoparticle therapy for patient-specific atherosclerosis is presented in terms of targeted delivery efficiency (eta) and plaque injury. Eulerian-Lagrangian technique is adopted, and an innovative model is first introduced for simulating targeted delivery drug-loaded particles to plaque, in which the shape and size of particles are taken into account in the drag coefficient C-D. The impacts of particle shape, size and magnetic field intensity on eta and plaque injury characterized by temporal-spatial averaged shear stress ((TAWSS) over bar) are investigated. The results signify that, among drug delivery using the transport particles of different shapes, the sequences of n and (TAWSS) over bar are platelet>cylinder>blade>sphere>brick, which indicates that the particle with higher drug targeting ability may induce greater plaque injury. Moreover, it is found that increasing the particle size from 300 to 500 nm or the current from 5E4 to 2E5 A enhances eta by nearly 9.3% or 18.1%, respectively, but behind this are greater damage to plaque itself. Along with this, the injury discrepancy of plaque induced by particles with different shapes is also amplified. Results obtained can potentially serve as the guideline to optimize the design of transport particle and magnetic field for targeted therapy to atherosclerosis. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available