Bias in presence-only niche models related to sampling effort and species niches: Lessons for background point selection
Published 2020 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Bias in presence-only niche models related to sampling effort and species niches: Lessons for background point selection
Authors
Keywords
Ecological niches, Probability density, Species delimitation, Environmental geography, Cryptic speciation, Simulation and modeling, Curve fitting, Species interactions
Journal
PLoS One
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages e0232078
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2020-05-21
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0232078
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- The unrealized potential of herbaria for global change biology
- (2018) Emily K. Meineke et al. ECOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS
- Bayesian estimation of species relative abundances and habitat preferences using opportunistic data
- (2018) Camille Coron et al. ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECOLOGICAL STATISTICS
- The interplay of various sources of noise on reliability of species distribution models hinges on ecological specialisation
- (2017) Alaaeldin Soultan et al. PLoS One
- What we use is not what we know: environmental predictors in plant distribution models
- (2016) Heidi K. Mod et al. JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE
- Minimum required number of specimen records to develop accurate species distribution models
- (2015) André S. J. van Proosdij et al. ECOGRAPHY
- A look inside the Pl@ntNet experience
- (2015) Alexis Joly et al. MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS
- Bayesian logistic regression for presence-only data
- (2015) Fabio Divino et al. STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT
- Point process models for presence-only analysis
- (2015) Ian W. Renner et al. Methods in Ecology and Evolution
- Spatial filtering to reduce sampling bias can improve the performance of ecological niche models
- (2014) Robert A. Boria et al. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING
- Predicting the Geographical Distribution of Two Invasive Termite Species From Occurrence Data
- (2014) Francesco Tonini et al. ENVIRONMENTAL ENTOMOLOGY
- Mapping Species Distributions with MAXENT Using a Geographically Biased Sample of Presence Data: A Performance Assessment of Methods for Correcting Sampling Bias
- (2014) Yoan Fourcade et al. PLoS One
- Understanding co-occurrence by modelling species simultaneously with a Joint Species Distribution Model (JSDM)
- (2014) Laura J. Pollock et al. Methods in Ecology and Evolution
- Bias correction in species distribution models: pooling survey and collection data for multiple species
- (2014) William Fithian et al. Methods in Ecology and Evolution
- Equivalence of MAXENT and Poisson Point Process Models for Species Distribution Modeling in Ecology
- (2013) Ian W. Renner et al. BIOMETRICS
- Model-Based Control of Observer Bias for the Analysis of Presence-Only Data in Ecology
- (2013) David I. Warton et al. PLoS One
- Point pattern modelling for degraded presence-only data over large regions
- (2011) Avishek Chakraborty et al. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES C-APPLIED STATISTICS
- Applications and limitations of museum data for conservation and ecology, with particular attention to species distribution models
- (2010) Tim Newbold PROGRESS IN PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY
- Species Distribution Models: Ecological Explanation and Prediction Across Space and Time
- (2009) Jane Elith et al. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics
- Sample selection bias and presence-only distribution models: implications for background and pseudo-absence data
- (2009) Steven J. Phillips et al. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS
- Effects of sample size on the performance of species distribution models
- (2008) M. S. Wisz et al. DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started